Once again I'm liveblogging Senate. On tonight's agenda: curriculum stuff, further discussion on the CFO for the Bike Co-Op, chit chat about the budget and a little digression into the results of the Senate Feedback Survey.5:53pm: Secretary Libby Piel and Senator Philip Gilmor appear to be involved in a shoving match. This is promising.
6:01pm: Speaker Hogan has begun the meeting. Roll Call shall not be called tonight, apparently. Index Assistant News Editor* Andrea Hewitt and I are sitting on opposite sides of the seating area. Speaker Hogan wonders if it's due to bad blood. (*corrected from "news reporter")
6:03pm: Kelly Seitter has been appointed as an Associate Senator.
6:04pm: President JoEllen Flanagan has just stated that she is about to "take out her goodies." She has commenced to throw a loaf of bread across the room to Academic Affairs Chair Charles Tomlinson, and is now threatening to whip a candy bar across the room to the just-entering Student Affairs Chair Kristyn Potter. Most interesting.
6:06pm: Is that Senator Sean Serroque I see sporting a Mac? A black sheep among the Senate PC-ers
6:07pm: President Flanagan has commended Student Affairs for having a very interesting page on the Senate Site. Link here.
6:09pm: Flanagan is still moving through her report. In other news, I'm quite looking forward to the V.P. Isaac Robinson's discussion on the University Budget. It's one of the main reasons I'm excited about the meeting tonight.
6:11pm: Robinson's Veep Report now. Next week, apparently, we're going to be discussing the student athletic fee committee. Should be quite the interesting discussion; I personally would like to.
6:12pm: The projector isn't working, so Student BOG Rep. Cody Sumter's presentation of Pershing Renovation stuff will have to wait for now. He is, however, saying that he's working on typing up a BOG selection "how-to" process document as well as plowing through the oodles and oodles of applications for the position of the President of the University. I do not envy him his job.
6:14pm: There's a communal groan as the score of the TSU Men's Basketball game against Mizzou is discussed. A fair percentage of Senate went to the game.
6:15pm: Speaker Hogan says that he is "going to do his damndest" to make sure the meeting ends before the Tool Academy finale tonight. He has also thrown down a challenge for anyone to beat his family in Family Feud. Any takers?
6:16pm: External Affairs is changing the name of the annual lobbying initiative, currently dubbed "Storm the Capitol." The name is being changed due to the fact that it is not really the best strategy to send oodles and oodles of students to mob and clutter the capitol building.
6:17pm: A note: Speaker Hogan reminds Senators that what happens in closed session stays in closed session. I am now scanning the room to see whom I could persuade to violate this rule.
6:20pm: Diversity Chair Dan Heagney notes that it was a bad week for the GLBT
6:21pm: Communication Chair Hillary Shoun has just informed Senate that they will be visiting every organization on campus before Winter Break, asking them for their feedback on Senate. Senator Lizz Esfeld asks how they are required to do this. Discussion abounds before Speaker Hogan threatens to smack the hammer around as he reminds Senate that this is a report and not a discussion time.
6:24pm: New rule for Senate people who are going to do an interview with an Index: they must call Comm. Chair Shoun before they do anything and tell her when they're meeting and what it's about. She will be present at the meeting as well. If they do not go through the Senate Comm. Chair they cannot do the interview.
6:27pm: No rule for interviews that are conducted via this website, however. Let the fun begin.
6:29pm: AcAff Chair Tomlinson moves for a second reading of the Curriculum Commission resolution on new a new curriculum model. Tomlinson is hesitant about moving forward with the resolution as students supported keeping Comm 170 (Public Speaking) and were lukewarm about getting rid of WACT courses.
6:31pm: Senator Esfeld believes, due to her multiple-year experience in dealing with curriculum issues (3 years, I believe she said) that students likely would benefit from this, and support this.
6:33pm: AcAff Chair Tomlinson says that 64% of students surveyed say WACT did not improve their writing, 52.5% said Comm 170 improved their public speaking.
6:35pm: Senator Slok Gyawali gives an international student perspective on abolishing both as requirements. He says asking intl. students to take courses in both writing and speaking in English during when they first arrive at Truman is a bit much to ask. Senator Hiroki Sato concurs with Senaor Gyawali.
6:39pm: Senator George Allen, Jr., elaborates on Senators' Gyawali and Sato's concerns about forcing students to take these English-incentive courses without an opt-out option for students who might not be able to handle the language demands they entail.
6:43pm: AcAff Chair Tomlinson brings up the possibility of creating an ESL version of this proposed course. He sounds less than enthusiastic about the idea. He also notes that Senate as a sampling of opinion is a little bit skewed, as many people within it probably found both WACT and Comm 170 not as helpful.
6:46pm: Senator Gyawali is talking about his experiences as an international student with taking "enhanced" courses at Truman (writing, in particular). He notes that while he was able to speak English almost perfectly when he first arrived at Truman he probably wouldn't have been able to handle a writing-enhanced course.
6:48pm: A question to ponder: would the creation of this writing-enhanced and speaking-enhanced course create a course different enough from the courses that are currently offered?
6:51pm: Senator Sato wants to know if it's possible for the current courses to be improved?
6:52pm: Senator Esfeld is discussing the concern of the international students. She says that the benefits of creating this new class is that it would create more community, more Truman Spirit, and that it would really benefit the curriculum at large. I have to say, I'm impressed with the concern Senate is showing for international students on this issue.
6:53pm: The resolution passes 11-4-0, with Senators Gyawali, Sato, Serroque and Williams voting "No."
6:55pm: AcAff Chair Tomlinson is discussing the results of the survey on Experiential Learning. Students' biggest concern is how effectively it could be implemented.
6:57pm: The resolution on Experiential Learning passes unanimously, with one abstention from a Senator. (Who didn't know what the vote was on.)
6:58pm: AcAff Chair Tomlinson is discussing a resolution to keep the same number and types of Modes of Inquiry. Senator Esfeld is concerned that the Senate body did not have enough time to read the resolution before today's discussion.
7:00pm: Quote Senator Esfeld: "I can't stand this resolution." She doesn't think it keeps us cutting-edge as an institution.
7:02pm: Senator Serroque notes that the admin is thinking about changing the model, and that he doesn't see the practicality in endorsing keeping the same model when there's current discussion of changing it.
7:03pm: Voting time. The resolution is voted down, 1-12-2.
7:05pm: A New Business item has been added as a result of the resolution being voted down. Discussion topic will be the core of the next curriculum, so that AcAff Chair Tomlinson will be prepared to speak on behalf of the body this Thursday.
7:06pm: Per a question from Diversity Chair/Senator Heagney AcAff Chair Tomlinson discusses some models being considered. The Community Discourse model combines pairs of modes that are centered on ways of thinking about the world, requiring 2 classes in 4 modes to be taken. The idea behind this is that this would bring more depth into the LSP, more choice and less structure. The 6 of 6 model condenses the current 7 of 8 model by combining the Art and Aesthetic Lit modes and the Physical and Life Sciences modes and requiring everyone to take a course from all modes.
7:09pm: Senator Esfeld is encouraging the body to "make a bold statement about the modes we want" rather than simply vote on models that don't go far enough.
7:10pm: Senator Buckler like the 7 or 8 mode system.
7:11pm: Thursday's meeting is the big UGC meeting where they discuss the results of the survey. In light of AcAff Chair Tomlinson's belief that there will not be a definitive action resulting on this topic of discussion Speaker Hogan would like to encourage everyone to work on creating a "bold statement," or at least help AcAff Chair Tomlinson craft one.
7:13pm: President Flanagan notes that Senate will be asked on Thursday that they will be asked which model they prefer. BOG Rep. Sumter asks if "we hate all three" is a valid choice; President Flanagan says it is, but AcAff Chair Tomlinson notes that even if Senate shoots down all three UGC will still choose one they don't like.
7:15pm: I've said it before but I'll say it again: AcAff Chair Tomlinson is very good for this position. You can very clearly
7:16pm: Senator Kristen Marshall is in favor of the Community Discourse model as she believes it best represents the LSP mode at Truman.
7:18pm: Senator/ExAff Chair Joey Shelton disagrees with Senator Marshall, and believes the 6 of 6 model is the best.
7:20pm: V.P. Robinson is talking about the University Budget right now. Currently, the Budget Committee is discussing what programs, offices, and services are vital to the University and should not be eliminated, and which ones should be eliminated.
7:21pm: Diversity Chair/Senator Heagney says that he would support cutting funds from Athletics, as at the end of the day they aren't important to our education. He says that cutting the entirety of Athletics would be "too much to hope for," but that cutting should happen.
7:22pm: AcAff Chair Tomlinson disagrees with Heagney, noting that athletics at this school bring in minorities and a lot of out-of-staters.
7:23pm: Senator Gilmor notes that cutting Athletics--even all of Athletics--wouldn't do much to help the budget situation, and that the resolution needs to be bigger than that. Robinson notes that school construction and scholarships take up over half the budget. Faculty, their retirement funds, and their benefits are also a large chunk..
7:24pm: When asked what the Budget Committee is considering cutting, Robinson says that "everything is on the table." Take note, Truman.
7:25pm: Right now, Robinson says, we're looking to lose $4 million from the state for this upcoming academic year and that we're likely to lose more given enrollment is down.
7:26pm: Senator Heagney brings up the idea of raising tuition by $500-$600 per student. BOG Rep. Sumter notes that as this is going to be affecting institutions everywhere, other universities will likely be considering the same actions, so comparatively we'll probably stay competitive.
7:28pm: Senator Gilmor notes that raising tuition is going to take some finagling. Treasurer Stephanie Kwon discusses raising the standards of our competitive scholarships, even though giving out many is something this school is known for.
7:29pm: President Flanagan brings the discussion away from solutions and back to actual tangible things that could or should be cut and could or should be kept.
7:31pm: Senator Heagney states that any cuts made to the Sociology/Anthropology Department would be devastating, and asks to avoid cuts there. Senator Gilmor says that the massive amount of scholarships we give out will "inevitably have to go."
7:33pm: Making class sizes bigger is a hot topic of discussion. President Flanagan encourages Senate to keep on giving her feedback.
7:35pm: President Flanagan is now discussing the formulation of a Senate Feedback Survey, which has not been conducted for quite some time. My apologies for the initial indication that this discussion was going to be on actual results of a survey; the survey has not even been created. Mea culpa. (Bad blogger!)
7:36pm: AcAff Chair Tomlinson suggests that a question be, "Why aren't you on Senate?" Also, "Do you pay attention to what we [Senate] do?" Also also, "Do you know how to pay attention to what we [Senate] do? (Blog, website, etc.)"
7:37pm: Senator Serroque proffers, "How informed are you on the issues?" and "How do you get your information?" Comm. Chair Shoun: "Do you understand how Senate works?" Senator Marshall: "Do you know someone on Senate?"
7:39pm: Speaker Hogan notes that a lot of these questions are open-ended, which is "fascinating" but makes it hard to get tangible feedback. He would encourage close-ended questions.
7:40pm: President Flanagan suggests a scale of feedback along the lines of "Strongly Disagree...Indifferent...Strongly Agree."
7:41pm: Student Affairs Chair Potter suggests using the phrasing "What is Student Senate not doing well?" and "What could Senate work on?" Senator/Diversity Chair Heagney: "Would you come to a campus-wide forum/would you consider it beneficial?" Senator Serroque: "How much do you think your voice matters."
7:43pm: It would appear that there is nothing else. The meeting is adjourned; Speaker Hogan has 15 minutes to get to a television showing Tool Academy. Best of luck to him, I'm out.
Recent Comments